 The Rude Awakening Wall Street, New York Thursday, June 23, 2005
------------------------- The Rude Awakening PRESENTS: Crude oil finally reached $60 a barrel
Is $70 next? Or $50? Let's ask the experts
--- Advertisement ---
The $241 Million "Mutual Fund" For only $2 a share, you can sneak into all 12 of these undiscovered companies
stocks that the SEC ordinarily only reserves for the mega rich. But now YOU too can double your money as these stocks rise
GUARANTEED or your money back! Find out more
|
------------------------- OIL AT A CROSSROADS By Justice Litle Crude oil finally reached $60 a barrel
Is $70 next? Or $50? Let's ask the experts
"The economy has accepted $50 oil. We accepted $2 gasoline, too
I think within a year from now, you're probably looking at $3 gasoline, and you're probably looking at something over $60 for oil." T. Boone Pickens, legendary oilman "In late 2006, I think you could see oil over $100. Whenever we've had oil shocks, it's because we've reached capacity, and we are at capacity in refining and extraction. When we look at each country's projections of oil consumption, we find we're consuming at a rate faster than it can be produced." Ray Dalio, CIO, Bridgewater Associates "As evidence of weakening demand and ample supply accumulates, the market may panic. The oil market has been the most speculative in this cycle. I believe it could correct in the most speculative fashion - it could collapse." Andy Xie, Morgan Stanley "It is too soon to draw any firm conclusions about the impact of high oil prices on global oil dependence, on U.S. and other imports and on increases in conservation and the supply of alternative fuels
the forecasts of EIA, IEA, and OPEC must be regarded to be at best illustrative of what might happen in a world where virtually everything goes right from the importer's view, where export capacities automatically respond to need and political and military risk have no impact." Anthony Cordesman and Khalid al-Rodhan, The Center for Strategic & International Studies So there you have it
Both sides of the crude oil debate make a compelling argument, but we are more persuaded by the bulls than the bears. If Dalio and Pickens are right, then crude oil consumers have only just begun to feel the pain, and prices will continue to rise until global demand is finally hit over the head with a sledgehammer. If Andy Xie is right, current prices are the result of a speculative blow off and oil could come crashing down in an avalanche of selling. The last quote, which best represents my own perspective, is taken from a CSIS study entitled "Uncertain Balance of Global Oil Supply and Demand: Crisis or Business as Usual." Rather than trying to make a definitive forecast, the authors of the study point out that uncertainty is extremely high, there is very little margin for error and the "happy" energy scenarios out there are based on everything going right
and nothing going wrong. In his collapsing oil view (see "Scary Oil," archived on the Morgan Stanley Web site), Andy Xie cites the potential for slower growth from Asia, particularly China. He also points to the aggressive development of alternative energy/oil substitutes like oil sands, coal liquefaction and LNG and even mentions the rising popularity of fuel- efficient vehicles. While Asia has begun to show early signs of slowdown, the rest of Xie's argument seems a bit of a stretch. Alternate energy supplies might contribute meaningful supplies a few years from now, but they will not arrive in time to trigger a near-term drop in oil prices. It's going to take a long time for new technologies to make a dent in the rapacious demand for crude oil that exists here and now, and at least in northern Nevada - where we are being invaded by yuppie Californians - I see at least two or three fuel-hog Hummer H2s for every one fuel- efficient Toyota Prius on the road. Gasoline demand has actually risen in the United States from this point last year. In saying that recent price action represents a "final frenzy," Xie lays most of the blame on profit-hungry financial institutions, stating that they have become dependent on commodity trading profits in the current low- yield environment. This line of thinking basically argues that $60 crude is unwarranted by the fundamentals - that rather than security risk and demand as supporting factors, crude is at record highs because reckless traders are pushing it up. This opinion seems a bit cavalier, partially because it's too easy to lay blame at the feet of traders, but mostly because there are reasonable and logical explanations for the price of crude being where it is. On the other side of the coin, you have plenty of well- informed observers who think we're in big trouble no matter what. This camp sees alternative energy as little more than a Band-Aid, and it presents very credible arguments, both for $60 oil today and for $100 oil within the next few years. For example, respected authority Matthew Simmons has written a book entitled, Twilight in the Desert, focusing on potentially alarming problems in Saudi Arabia. From the inside flap: "The secretive Saudi government repeatedly assures the world that its oil fields are healthy beyond reproach and that they can maintain and even increase output at will to meet skyrocketing global demand. But what if they can't? Twilight in the Desert looks behind the curtain to reveal a Saudi oil and production industry that could soon approach a serious, irreversible decline. In this exhaustively researched book, veteran oil industry analyst Matthew Simmons draws on his own three-plus decades of insider experience and more than 200 independently produced reports about Saudi petroleum resources and production operations. What he uncovers is a story about Saudi Arabia's troubled oil industry, not to mention its political and societal instability, which differs sharply from the globally accepted Saudi version." So are the Saudis lying about their reserves? While the Saudi government confidently claims plenty of oil for all, it refuse to allow outsiders to independently verify those claims. Seems a bit suspicious, doesn't it? If the Saudi fields are approaching a sharp decline, as Simmons believes, then the government would definitely have interest in hiding it from the world for as long as possible. It's hard to imagine the turmoil and chaos that would erupt if news were to spread that the "central bank of oil" is running dry. The Saudi Kingdom would likely implode, and the world would panic. So where does that leave us? Clearly, Morgan Stanley's Xie makes reasonable points for the long term. Alternative energy and fuel-efficiency advances will eventually moderate the global demand for oil somewhat. But this forecast has to be balanced against the stark realities that global energy demand is steadily rising, while the world's once-reliable supplies are running down. In the short term, crude oil's high price is a rational response to the uncertainty of supply, coupled with exceptionally strong demand. We have a demand-driven "lack of slack" in the system, too little margin for error and too many potential problems hiding below the surface. As we see it, the most reckless speculators in the crude oil market are the brave souls who are betting on a DROP in oil prices. [Ed. Note: You may not be in a position to personally buy out the Saudis just yet
but you can still step in to the profits ring with Dan Denning's Strategic Options Alert. Find out how to grab the entire oil industry for just $2.80, and flip it in ten days for 129% in the pocket. Strategic Options Alert --- Advertisement --- Up 700% in 2 Years
and Climbing We've discovered a tiny company that BENEFITS from every new FDA rejection. Reuters reports, "[This company's] share price has multiplied by more than seven over the last two years." And in just the last few months it's rocketed from $13 to around $20 a share. But that's just the tip of the iceberg
With Big Pharma and the FDA continuing to butt heads, this stock could soar to $100 by January 2006. Business Week reports that "all told, the FDA has issued 23 safety alerts this year - three times as many as it put out by this time last year." With Pfizer is having trouble with its Cox-2 pain relievers Celebrex and Bextra and Merck withdrawing Vioxx from the market, it's no wonder this stock could gain 654%. To read the full free report, "Make 654% Off the FDA's $12 Billion Drug Sabotage," visit this link: http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/TPS/WTPSF600 ------------------------- Did You Notice
? By Eric J. Fry Jay Shartsis is not a reckless speculator, but he is a speculator - one who thinks oil stocks are ripe for a fall. Oil stocks won't fall forever, Shartsis believes, but they might fall very soon. Shartsis, a seasoned options trader at R.F. Lafferty in New York, has spent several decades tracking the sort of short-term sentiment indicators that can enable an options trader to make a buck or two. The indicators are not perfect of course - or Jay might be sharing his thoughts from the cabin of his private jet, rather than the "trading turret" of his Manhattan office - but they can be very helpful. "Oil stocks are on a slippery slope," Jay remarked yesterday, as he cited a couple of indicators showing extreme bullish behavior by oil stock investors. "The approach of oil to $60 per barrel has created a frenetic mindset among traders as assets in the Rydex energy fund have soared to new highs of $200.9 million, up from near $112 million in just one month." As the chart below illustrates, the last time investors plowed this much money so enthusiastically into the Rydex Energy Fund, oil stocks promptly tumbled. Shartsis does not anticipate an exact replay of the March sell off, but doesn't rule out a swift sell off. 
In addition, he notes, "plenty of call-option activity has also been observed in energy stocks. For example, the ever- popular Valero (VLO, $80.46) traded 44,788 options on Tuesday, 33,671 of them calls against a daily average of 21,945. The stock made a new high by 30 cents to $82.25, but may have staged a false breakout. "Can it be so easy," Shartsis wonders, "to just chase the energy stocks at these levels and make money?" Maybe yes, maybe no
We eagerly await the verdict. [Ed. Note: If Jay's indicators are more than just private jet mumbo-jumbo, you might want to have a peak at this energy report from the team at Outstanding Investments. Find out why making 8 or 9 times your money on energy plays is not out of the question here: Outstanding Investments
------------------------- And the Markets
| Wednesday | Tuesday | This week | Year-to-Date | DOW | 10,588 | 10,599 | 75 | -1.8% | S&P | 1,214 | 1,214 | 16 | 0.2% | NASDAQ | 2,092 | 2,091 | 29 | -3.8% | 10-year Treasury | 3.94% | 4.05% | -0.10 | -0.27 | 30-year Treasury | 4.24% | 4.33% | -0.08 | -0.58 | Russell 2000 | 643 | 641 | 17 | -1.2% | Gold | $438.35 | $438.70 | $11.30 | 0.2% | Silver | $7.25 | $7.29 | -$0.02 | 6.4% | CRB | 309.58 | 311.35 | 7.10 | 9.0% | WTI NYMEX CRUDE | $58.09 | $58.90 | $4.55 | 33.7% | Yen (YEN/USD) | JPY 108.82 | JPY 108.26 | -0.19 | -6.1% | Dollar (USD/EUR) | $1.2128 | $1.2176 | -9 | 10.5% | Dollar (USD/GBP) | $1.8221 | $1.8290 | -99 | 5.0% |
|