
The Rude Awakening Wall Street, New York Wednesday, June 1, 2005
------------------------- The Rude Awakening PRESENTS: "A couple years ago, lowly valued oil-drilling stocks couldn't seem to find any investors. Today, investors can't seem to find any lowly valued drilling stocks
except maybe in Canada
" --- Advertisement ---
The impending "Petrocalypse" that's already beginning
But you have a chance to post incredible financial gains of up to 3,000% or more! Six months ago, an analyst group made up of former top- level U.S. government officials calculated a global oil scenario beginning RIGHT NOW, December of 2005
In this extremely likely scenario, just 3 minor disruptions in the already-strained world oil supply chain cause: *$150-a-barrel crude prices *A $5.32 pump price for gas *More than 2 million jobs lost *A 28% drop in the S&P 500. But this is just the tip of the iceberg
Learn more here:
|
------------------------- A BIT ABOUT DRILLING By Eric J. Fry "Ten years ago, a geologist couldn't find a job," recalls Dan Sarnecki, from the Alberta Energy & Utilities Board in Calgary, "Now, you can't find a geologist." But if you DO find a geologist, you don't find one cheap. Finding drilling rigs isn't easy either
or cheap, which should be very good news for oil-drilling companies. "Rig day rates are rapidly escalating to record or near- record levels, taking even the largest offshore drilling contractors by surprise," the Petroleum News reports. "Three months ago, Transocean chief executive Robert Long reported that rates for the company's second and third generation offshore drilling rigs, for example, had moved from $50,000 per day in 2004 to around $100,000 per day
Since then, rig rates for second and third generation offshore rigs have moved as high as $160,000 a day." Not surprisingly, therefore, the cost of finding and pumping a barrel of oil -- including labor, equipment and seismic testing - cost a record $17.12 last year, up 43 percent from a year earlier, based on data compiled by Bloomberg News. But one company's expense is another company's revenue. And in this case, the rising costs of extracting oil from its geologic hiding places are appearing as rising revenues on the top lines of many oil services companies. First-quarter profits quadrupled, for example, at Transocean and GlobalSanteFe, two of the world's largest offshore drilling companies. Of course, anyone can see that rig rates are very high right now. The question is whether they will remain high
and for how long. And since there aren't any 2008 issues of the Petroleum News lying around our office, we cannot say for certain how high rig rates might be in three years' time, or even in three months' time. But based on the evidence contained in the dog-eared pages of a couple of recent 2005 issues, the outlook for the oil-drilling industry seems promising. The current boom seems likely to have staying power, mostly because the bust that preceded it persisted for so many years. During the dark decade of sub-$20 oil, oil-drilling activity seized up like an overmatched drill bit. Very few souls dared to invest in an industry that offered such dismal economic prospects. The many years of under- investment set the stage for today's rising rig rates. Therefore, GlobalSantaFe chief executive Jon Marshall predicts, "We may have entered a longer and more robust drilling cycle than we've seen in many years." Marshall's optimistic outlook finds sample anecdotal support. For starters, rig utilization rates have been climbing sharply. 88.4 percent of the worldwide fleet is being used today, up from 81.7 percent a year ago and 80.9 percent five years ago, according to ODS-Petrodata figures. ``We have virtually everything that we own booked for the summer,'' says Hank Swartout, CEO of Precision Drilling Corp., Canada's largest oilfield-services company. As should be expected, rig-builders are scrambling to meet the new demand. But that effort seems unlikely to pressure rig rates any time soon. "Rowan, whose fleet consists almost entirely of jack-ups, believes that it's unlikely that construction of new offshore jack-up rigs over the next decade can keep pace with the expected world-wide demand for shallow-water drilling," Bloomberg News relates. "Rowan's conclusion is based on the average number of new rigs expected to be delivered into the market each year vs. the attrition rate of older rigs, plus the relatively small number of shipyards around the world willing to build new jack-ups. The company noted that by 2010 more than 93 percent of today's world-wide jack-up fleet will be over 20 years old." And even if shipyards supply the oil industry with lots of new rigs, the new rigs might go begging for qualified rig personnel. There are about 15,000 Canadian pipe fitters and other tradesmen available to fill 25,000 jobs over the next five years as Shell, Suncor Energy Inc. and other producers expand, according to Neil Camarta, a senior vice president with Shell's Canadian unit, "The oil and gas industry is booming, and that's made it harder to find qualified people because they can command bigger bucks now,'' says Alberta's Sarnecki. ``We're having to offer people more money because demand for their services is so much bigger than what it was.'' Happily for oil services companies, the rising costs of providing their services are rising slower than the revenues they've been receiving. Entry-level geologists at U.S. oil companies may be earning a hefty average salary of $65,600, but that's only 24 percent more than these "petro- nerds" earned in 1999. For perspective, rig rates have more than tripled over the same time frame. In short, we suspect that oil-drillers will continue to enjoy brisk demand for their services for the next few years, exactly as many industry insiders predict. In which case, the shares of oil-drillers and oil-services stocks should continue performing well, especially the relatively cheap Canadian stocks. Faithful Rude Awakening readers may recall the column of April 7
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/RudeAwake/Articles/RA040605a. html
in which we observed, "Canadian contract oil-drillers and oil service companies sell for very steep discounts to their American counterparts." Two months later, they still do
although not as steep as before. 
Over the last few weeks, the discount between the two has been narrowing recently. Perhaps that's a fluke, perhaps not. Either way, Canadian oil services companies have advanced about 4% since early April, while American oil service companies have DROPPED about 4%. We cannot be sure that this recent trend is indicative of future trends, but we wouldn't rule it out. The valuation gap between the Canadian and American oil service stocks should continue closing, as no significant fundamental distinction between the two would seem to validate the "Canadian discount." Stocks like Precision Drilling (TSE: PD) and Ensign Resource Service Group (TSE: ESI) need not continue to sell for much lower valuations than their American peers. A couple years ago, lowly valued oil-drilling stocks couldn't seem to find any investors. Today, investors can't seem to find any lowly valued drilling stocks
but they can still find a few reasonably valued stocks, especially up in Canada. [Ed. Note: If you are the type who loves getting in on the ground floor with undervalued companies, Chris Mayer, editor of the Fleet Street Letter, has uncovered a stellar pick that turns out 300% profits
all day, every day. Click here to learn more: Chris Mayer's Fleet Street Letter --- Advertisement --- In His 2004 Newsletters, Doug Casey Recommended 3 Uranium Companies To Buy In A Hurry
Following his advice would have already made you 1,497% on one
1,412% on the second
and 340% on the third
all in less than one year! Now subscribers are following up on three new picks: A small company with a breakthrough model for the waste industry (short-term upside 100% or more)
an exquisitely managed Canadian company that controls the largest high- quality fertilizer deposit in fertilizer-starved China (upside 635% or more)
and another that is sitting on 7 gold deposits containing 2 million ounces of gold (and growing), plus the mill needed to extract the gold, yet is selling for just 25 cents a share, a fraction of its true value! FREE Special Reports on those companies, and a 30-day trial to Doug's newsletter - now in its 26th year (so you know it's got to be good) - are yours for the asking with zero obligations. http://www1.youreletters.com/t/151821/1380489/775934/0 ------------------------- Did You Notice
? By Eric J. Fry In March, foreign central banks became net sellers of U.S. Treasury bonds and notes for the first time in almost three years. And they sold quite a bit. One month does not make a trend, of course. But it does seem a curious moment to unload Treasury securities. Hasn't the dollar been rallying? And haven't competing assets, like stock been, falling? Perhaps the sellers distrust the dollar rally. After suffering a falling dollar for three straight years, the recent mini-rally might seem like a gift from above. 
Or maybe the central banks are selling Treasuries just because they are "stretching for yield," just like ordinary bond-fund managers might. "Foreign central banks are buying fewer Treasuries," observes James Grant, editor of Grant's Interest Rate Observer. "Over the past three months, growth in Treasury securities held in custody by the Fed for the account of foreign central banks rose at an annual rate of just 3.3%. But over the same three months, Fannies, Freddies and Ginnies [i.e. government agency bonds] held in custody for their non-American owners registered growth of 59.8?" Why might this be so? Grant suspects the central banks are selling low-yielding Treasuries to invest in higher- yielding securities. State Street Global Advisors, which manages $57 billion in assets for 33 central banks, lends support to Grant's suspicion. "The great majority of our clients are looking to push their investment boundary out along the risk spectrum," reports the head of State Street's central-bank advisory division. We don't begrudge our foreign lenders the right to "shop for yield," but we do fear it. If foreign central banks are shunning our low-yielding Treasury securities, these securities won't remain "low-yielding" for long. Interest rates will rise
until the banks become eager buyers once again. We'll be watching
[Ed. Note: Dan Denning, editor of Strategic Investment, will also be watching. Dan knows better than most the potentially catastrophic effects of a sharp rise in interest rates, especially for homeowners. He explains here
Strategic Investment
------------------------- And the Markets
| Tuesday | Friday | This week | Year-to-Date | DOW | 10,467 | 10,543 | 327 | -2.9% | S&P | 1,192 | 1,199 | 38 | -1.7% | NASDAQ | 2,068 | 2,076 | 91 | -4.9% | 10-year Treasury | 4.00% | 4.07% | -0.12 | -0.22 | 30-year Treasury | 4.33% | 4.43% | -0.15 | -0.49 | Russell 2000 | 617 | 617 | 35 | -5.3% | Gold | $417.40 | $420.25 | -$3.00 | -4.6% | Silver | $7.40 | $7.25 | $0.48 | 8.6% | CRB | 300.83 | 300.89 | 6.98 | 6.0% | WTI NYMEX CRUDE | $51.97 | $51.85 | $3.30 | 19.6% | Yen (YEN/USD) | JPY 108.55 | JPY 108.00 | -1.23 | -5.8% | Dollar (USD/EUR) | $1.2305 | $1.2580 | 328 | 9.2% | Dollar (USD/GBP) | $1.8173 | $1.8242 | 333 | 5.3% |
|