History - The Great Teacher
History - The Great Teacher by Puru Saxena The Daily Reckoning Wednesday, July 19, 2006 --------------------- - More on that "minor threat" in Levant
a brief history on oil-centric thought
- This just in to the DR: Oprah is not gay
phew!
We've decided to tell you how to curb the catastrophic consequences of an oil shortage
- Reports of weakness in the consumer economy are drifting into camp like soldiers after a major defeat
Bill watches the people of London undress
and more!
--------------------- --- SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT --- The Agora Financial Reserve Is Open.
Join now and get all of our top research - for life. Make sure you secure your membership soon
this offer is only good until midnight on July 30, 2006. Click on the link below for a letter from the Reserve Founder: Agora Financial Reserve - Open Until July 30 ---------------------
Israeli troops crossed the border into Lebanon yesterday. Markets typically react to "geopolitical risk," sometimes exaggerating the danger
sometimes brushing it off. Yesterday, investors judged the war in Lebanon only a minor threat. Gold fell $22 to $629. And oil sold off, to just over $75. Now, markets, like democracies, can never really be wrong; there is no higher authority. If they say oil is worth $75 a barrel and no more, then that is what it is worth. But, the burden of today's little reflection is that investors could, and should, change their minds. Not that we have any idea what the future will bring. The gods still keep their secrets. But the past blabs: oil and war is a dangerous mixture. Investors are aware, of course, that war affects oil. It was war in the Levant that drove up the price of oil in the '70s and caused the worst world economic slowdown since the '30s. Every hint of war since has caused the oil market to shudder. However, what is under-appreciated, in our view, is how oil affects war. With the advent of mechanized warfare, oil - not superior generalship or better weapons - has been decisive. In World War I, Germany could not win because oil had already become the key ingredient of modern warfare and it didn't have any. In World War II, oil was even more important. The Allied war effort was fueled by abundant stocks of Texas crude, while the Axis powers were always running out of gas at critical moments. The Germans were beaten in the desert of North Africa largely because Rommel's tanks went dry. And at the battle of the Bulge, again, the poor Krauts were undone by lack of vernacular as well as lack of combustible. Posing as an American soldier - a Wehrmacht trooper asked for "benzene" instead of "gas." In both Europe and Asia, Axis strategies slipped up on oil. The Huns made for the oilfields of Rumania. The Japanese had a go at Pearl Harbor. Not that Hawaii was an oil producer. The Nippon high command attacked the American base after Japan had been cutoff from supplies of Texas oil. At that point, it saw no choice but to try to cripple the U.S. fleet, so that it couldn't interdict oil supplies to Japan from other countries! In both cases, Asia and Eurasia, the oil-centered strategy proved fatal; it shifted the focus of the campaign from destroying the enemy to protecting fuel lines. Hitler moved forces from the crucial attack on Moscow to the south, in order to secure his oil supplies. Tojo stretched out his army throughout the South Pacific in order to protect his "Southern Resource Area." We don't know how much oil-centric thinking entered the minds of America's strategic planners for the war in Iraq, or if they did any serious thinking at all. In Robert MacNamara's memoir of his time as head of the U.S. Defense Department during the Vietnam War, the "brightest and best" apparently spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to win the war, but somehow forgot to think about why they were fighting in the first place. In any event the war was lost
and it made no difference. Still, we can't help but notice the way the world has turned since 1945. The Texas oil fields peaked out 30 years ago. The North Sea rigs hit maximum production two years ago. Now, it is the Anglo-American empire that fears for its oil supplies and bends its wars to fit its energy needs. America today, like Japan and Germany in the 1930s, buys most of its oil on the open market. And like the Axis powers in the '30s, most of the world's oil comes from places that it cannot control, without stretching its military forces beyond their abilities - the Middle East, Russia, Venezuela. Looking backwards, it is easy to see that the Germans and Japanese would have been better off building up their economies, rather than their military forces. They could have stayed out of imperial politics and bought the oil they needed. Would the same course be best for the United States too? More news from our pundit of world currency
--------------
Chuck Butler reporting from the EverBank trading desk:
"I fully expect the Reserve Bank of Australia to raise rates at their next meeting in August. Once we get past this risk-aversion phase we're in right now, I can see the dollar getting hit on all sides." Chuck has more on interest rates in today's
Daily Pfennig
-------------- Back to Bill Bonner, across the pond
*** Oprah denies she's gay. Pamela Anderson is getting married. The Israelis are on the ground in Lebanon. Who has any time or attention left to think? Not us. We've been wondering about Oprah for a long time. And Pam Anderson. We're so happy for her. *** The war in Lebanon might be worth thinking about. Not the war itself
after so many years of wars, terrorist attacks, walls, bombings, peace talks, and truces, who can still care what happens? No, what interests us is the explosive mixture of oil and war. And what the market is saying about it, which is not much. The market is probably right, in the sense that the war is not likely to have much effect on the actual quantity of available oil. But we think it fails to entirely appreciate the risk. The financial importance of any move, after all, is determined by multiplying the likelihood of it times the consequences. The likelihood of an oil shortage may be slight. But the consequences may be so catastrophic that investors should be taking precautions. They should be buying gold, and hoping the price drops below $600 again, so they can buy more. [Ed. Note: Our own Justice Litle has found a way for you to buy gold for as little as one-tenth what other bullion investors will pay
while making as much as 12 times what they'll make on every move upward in the gold price. Get his full special report here: Zero-Downside Gold
A lack of oil distorts a military power's strategy
and probably dooms it to defeat. What was a barrel of oil worth to Hirohito in 1944? Or to Rommel in 1943? Almost an infinite amount. What will a barrel of oil really be worth to America in 2006
2007
or 2008? We don't know, but a higher price will have extremely prejudicial consequences for the economy. When Americans buy oil, they take dollars out of their pockets and send them to oil producers. As the price rises, they are left with fewer dollars to buy anything else. Already, reports of weakness in the consumer economy are drifting into camp like soldiers after a major defeat - wounded, hungry and discouraged. House prices are slipping on both coasts. Today's news brings a report from Philadelphia, South Jersey and Delaware: house prices are going down in the mid-Atlantic region. Yesterday's news told us of falling prices even in San Diego. And "Orange County foreclosures rising sharply," adds a headline today. Retailers' stocks are in decline. "Target lowering sales forecast," says the Wall Street Journal. Builders are collapsing. Auto sales are falling. Employment growth is softening. And real consumer spending is slowing. And here comes news that the federal deficit is shrinking. Good news for the long run, but bad news for here and now. With consumers forced to come to their senses, the only reckless spendthrift left may be the U.S. government. We have no way of reading tomorrow's headlines, but we think we know what some might tell us: people in the summer of 2006 failed to appreciate the risks of oil and war. *** Your editor normally wears a tie to work. He does so out of habit
and because, along with his age, it gives him a slight distinction. New employees often mistake him for someone of authority. But he is sans cravat today. "Record Heat on Buses, Tube" is one of today's top headlines in London. To us, veterans of the Maryland Tidewater, it seems rather pleasant and comfortable. We walked home from work yesterday, about an hour and a half, without breaking a sweat. But the English aren't used to heat. Men have taken off their jackets and ties. Women have stripped down, too. You used to have to pay good money to see them in such a state of undress. But that was a long time ago
and far, far away. --- Advertisement ---
RETIRE TO PARADISE! Learn about the world's 9 best places to live or retire. Live well on $19 a Day Own an exotic beachfront getaway for $35,000. Or romantic pied-a-terre for under $60,000. Enjoy fine restaurant dining for $7 per person. Employ a maid or gardener for $6 a day. Buy comprehensive health insurance for $20 per month. Get the details in your FREE report now! |
--------------------
Sign Up For The Daily Reckoning Written by the authors of the New York Times business #1 best seller Empire of Debt, The Daily Reckoning has the most innovative way of weaving valuable information about investing and living into a format that is not only educational but also entertaining. To sign up for this FREE service enter your e-mail address below To share or not to share? That is not the question. We don't. -- Craig Collins-Young, DR Shakespearean assistant editor |
|