Speculators
Speculators: The Speculator as Hero by Doug Casey The Daily Reckoning Ouzilly, France Wednesday, November 2, 2005 Doug Casey dispels the negative stereotype many people have of Speculators. --------------------- - The majority of investors are steadfastly bullish - even when it doesn't pay
empty ideas
- Reckless complacency
looking back at the death of equities
indefinite debt
- The suspicious idea of economic mobility
what you get when an economy goes from young and dynamic - to old and rigid
and more!
--------------------- The markets are supposed to reflect all that is known. Day by day, hour by hour, minute by minute they react to the news, to opinions, and maybe even to the passing planets. In this sense, they are "perfect." Nobody knows more than they do. Which is merely to say that the markets are as imbecilic as the majority of stoneheads who invest in them. What is remarkable to us is that so many investors find nothing remarkable about today's markets. The Dow is still where it has been for several years, while the majority of investors remain steadfastly bullish. According to Investors Intelligence, the majority has been bullish for 158 straight weeks, longer than any stretch since they began keeping track 42 years ago. You'd think they would get tired of being bullish - especially when it doesn't pay. If the market is perfect you can never go wrong by buying at the market price. That is, if you decide that a price is too high or too low, you are more likely to be wrong than right - because you will always know less than the market itself - which says the current price is the right one. Obviously, the whole idea is empty. When an investor buys or sells, he is not really arguing with the current price, he is just guessing about tomorrow's price. All the current price really tells you is what emotion has a grip on investors right now. The emotion we see is reckless complacency. Gas prices have doubled. Is that a problem? Nope. The trade deficit has reached 6% of GDP. Is that a problem? Nope. There's a war in Iraq that looks increasingly un-winnable
financed by borrowing from Asian rivals. Do you see a problem? Nope. American consumers' earnings have been falling for the last two years, while their debt levels continue to rise. Does that bother anyone? Nope. No, dear reader, there is nothing to worry about. Yes, debt levels are higher than ever, but this is a new era, in which people can support more debt - permanently. And the trade deficit? It has almost disappeared from the news. We've had a growing trade deficit ever since Alan Greenspan first stepped into the Fed. It hasn't hurt us yet, has it? And what about consumers? Well, they may be earning less, but their houses are still rising. So, they still have money to spend. That's what the markets are telling us. The markets have much more information than we do. And they say we can relax. The morons! This seems like a good occasion to recall another new era, the one that came to an end almost as soon as it was first announced. In 1965, the Dow began the year at 874. It took 17 years - until 1981 - for it to climb one lousy point to 875 at the close of 1981. Famously, Business Week heralded this new era in an article entitled, "The Death of Equities:" "The U.S. should regard the death of equities as a near-permanent condition. Even if the economic climate could be made right again for equity investment, it would take another massive promotional campaign to bring people back into the market. The range of investment opportunities is so much wider now than in the 1950s that it is unlikely that the experience of two decades ago, when the number of equity investors increased by 250% in 15 years, could be repeated. Nor is it likely that Wall Street would ever again launch such a promotional campaign." Thus began a great new bull market in equities that lasted until 2000
by which time several new eras had been announced. In these new New Eras, stocks were supposed to go in only one direction: up. In the following five years, the Nasdaq collapsed and the Dow fell; neither has yet recovered. And now, in today's New Era, we are supposed to be able to tolerate a much higher level of debt than ever before
indefinitely. That's what Mr. Market is telling us. It was only eight years ago that the market in credit derivatives began. In 1997, the market volume reached $55 billion. Since then, it has soared to more than $4 trillion. Only now is the market getting its "first test," says the Financial Times. Many derivative contracts were based on Delphi corporate bonds. How will the market sort them out now that Delphi has gone bust? We will see in the next few days. Yesterday, Mr. Market still seemed to smile on this brave new era. We wonder what will happen when he changes his mind. More news from our team at The Rude Awakening
-------------- Chris Mayer, reporting from Gaithersburg, Maryland: "A 'seismic shift' is underway, Jim Chanos warned a packed house at last week's Grant's Fall Investment Conference in Manhattan, 'and it will destroy the profitability of several well-known American companies.'" For the rest of this story, and for more market insights, see today's issue of The Rude Awakening: The Next Enron -------------- Bill Bonner, back in France with more views
*** To no one's surprise, the Fed raised rates for the 12th consecutive time, pushing the benchmark federal funds target rate to its highest level since June 2001. "All the changes coming for the Fed leave for a lot of uncertainties and that is something that gold often rallies on the back of - this time around it could be an exponential increase," our commodities expert, Kevin Kerr, told MarketWatch. At the same time, gold is testing the $460 level and may fall a bit further, he said. "The yellow metal seems to snap back just as quick as it sees profit taking though, so the short side of the market needs to be cautious," he said, adding that "traders need to see gold at these levels as a gift that we may not see for some time again." [Ed. Note: Since Kevin started his commodity options trading service, Resource Trader Alert, in July of 2004, he's recommended 29 winners out of 32 recommendations. That's an astounding 90% success rate - and we're not talking about small successes, either. He recommended 10 total trades in 2004, with an average gain of 104%. His track record speaks for itself, but find out why he's earned this unique nickname
The Maniac Trader *** Mommas don't want their babies to grow up to be cowboys or factory workers because there's no money in it
and probably no future. The money is made in finance
on Wall Street! One of the big changes in the last 30 years in America (and most of the developed nations) is that the rich are getting richer, and there is apparently less economic mobility. We are a little suspicious of the whole idea of mobility. We grew up in a house without running water much of the time. We were about the poorest people we knew. We can't remember anything that would have kept us from getting ahead
except ourselves. "But that was a long time ago," said Elizabeth. "Now, it's much harder to get into a good job. You have to go to a top business school to get a job at Goldman Sachs, for example. And you can't get into a good business school without going to a good college. And it's hard to get into a good college if you don't go to the right secondary schools." We did not go to the right secondary schools; at the time, we didn't even know there were "right" secondary schools. We just went to the local high school with the other sons of tobacco farmers and Chesapeake watermen. But it didn't seem to make any difference. We wonder, in fact, if all the time we spent in school was not a complete waste of time. We learn by reading, watching, listening and thinking. College seems like a way to avoid having to learn anything
by doing papers, taking tests and going to keg parties. This may not be true of engineers and scientists. But in our line of work, a college education may actually be a drawback. All it does is fill heads with whatever claptrap is popular at the moment. "That may be true of you. But most people get regular jobs," Elizabeth continued. "And regular jobs require regular credentials. I've actually spent a lot of time watching how it works here in France. The public schools do a fairly good job. But without a family pushing the student - by drilling him, bringing in tutors, and making sure he goes to a good school - the poor guy has a big disadvantage. He won't do as well on the tests, so he won't get into the best universities, so he won't get the best jobs. It's that simple." Both America and Europe have become more rigid, say the statistics. People at the top stay there, and earn more money. People at the bottom earn less (they are the major victims of Asian wage competition) and have less opportunity to move up. In the last 10 years, writes our old friend Scott Burns, the percentage of national income earned by the lower half of earners fell from 15% to 14%. The top 25%, on the other hand, saw their portion raise more than two percentage points - from 62.45% to 64.86%. And the top 1% gained an average of $63,040 in purchasing power. The poor people at the bottom made little economic headway. While earnings rose over the 10-year period, prices of energy, housing and health insurance soared. In the last two years, average earnings have actually gone down in real terms
with annual gains in income less than inflation. *** Another way to look at this phenomenon is this: When an economy is young, dynamic and open, anyone can get ahead. All it takes is luck and pluck, as they say. That is when the economy is growing richer, and people are producing things they can sell at a profit. But when an economy becomes old and rigid, it shifts from making to buying
from earning to borrowing
from G.M. to Wal-Mart
from Detroit to Wall Street
from manufacturing to finance
from savings to debt
from ability to status
from what you know to who you know
and from how much you've learned to where you went to school. --- Advertisement --- Make the Next 10 Years the Most Profitable Years of Your Life Imagine only 10 years from right now you could have enough money to give your family everything they've ever wanted
retire in style
and enjoy the rest of your life any way you desire. If you follow my advice, you could make 50% a year for the next 10 straight years, Guaranteed, or your money back. That means turning $10,000 into $576, 650
or $25,000 into $1.4 million
or
$50,000 into $2.8 million. There isn't anyone in the industry willing to make you that kind of a promise. Begin your profitable journey today. http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/CPT/ECPTFB09 Sign up for The Daily Reckoning
Learn what you can expect from today's markets and how to prosper in the face of uncertainty. Enter your e-mail address below: We will not share your email address with anyone else, period. -Andrew Palmer, Director E-commerce Marketing We Value Your Privacy |
|