| A MILLION-DOLLAR INTERNET IDEA THE DAILY RECKONING OUZILLY, FRANCE THURSDAY, 4 NOVEMBER 1999 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * In Today's Daily Reckoning: *** Nothing happening on Wall Street *** A new mayor in Baltimore
*** Brute force in Chechnya * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** I'm waiting for something to happen. In the stock market, that is. But nothing much does. *** Yesterday, the Nasdaq did close above 3,000. The S&P and Dow rose slightly
but not enough to mention. *** All the activity is still in the techs and Nets. They haven't peaked out yet
but when? How to make your own Internet fortune
below
. *** Gold rose slightly, too. No clear direction there, either. *** The dollar came closer to 100 yen yesterday
down to 103 before bouncing back to close at 105. *** The European Commission has given the French eight days to drop their ban on English beef. *** Lynn Carpenter's "rubber meets the road" approach to the Internet is paying off. Instead of investing in the Internet companies themselves, she found a shipping company she believed would benefit from the rise in e-commerce. Unlike the Internets, the company had profits
and a reasonable stock price. The stock was priced at $17 when she recommended it. Now it's $30. And rumor has it that Deutsche Post is about to try to buy it -- at $40 a share! For more information on Lynn's picks in "The Fleet Street Letter," in the U.S. call 1-800-433-1528, or from outside the U.S. call 410-234-0691. Ask for code 3472. Or visit http://209.70.9.80/secure/form2.cfm?pubcode=fsus *** I'm constantly amazed by DR readers. One sent me his Cartesian approach to market timing
reprinted below
*** Now it's official
Mike O'Malley has been elected mayor of Baltimore
"the first white mayor in 12 years." Why the color matters is anyone's guess. The city was just as much of a dump under lily-white William Shaefer as coal- black Kurt Schmoke. But O'Malley promises a "zero tolerance" policy on crime. *** This would be a big improvement
but it recalls previous moronic initiatives against crime in Baltimore. One was the Gun Buy Back program
where the city created a market in used handguns, which allowed the criminal world to trade in its old, wornout models at inflated prices, so that new, more powerful ones could be purchased. Another was the Murder Free Day proclaimed by Mayor Schmoke a few years ago
in which the City Fathers called on civic- minded killers to control their homicidal tendencies for one 24-hour period. As I recall, no decline in the murder rate was detected. *** An interesting footnote in the intelligence and race discussion. I've met both Schmoke and Shaefer. There's no doubt in my mind that Schmoke, the Rhodes Scholar (what would Cecil Rhodes have thought!), is more intelligent than Shaefer, the ward heeler. Maybe 10 IQ points. Maybe more. But come to think of it, most of the damage done in the 20th century can be traced to the dumb ideas put forward by smart people: Freudianism, Marxism, Nazism, cubism, bauhausism, Rooseveltism, suburbanism, welfare statism, Barbara Streisandism
Intelligence seems to be no protection against imbecility. On the contrary, it takes a high IQ to appreciate and embrace many of the absurdities of modern life. *** In Chechnya, meanwhile, the Russians have escalated beyond lies to brute force. "Wasted any Chechens [?]," responded one Russian pilot to a reporter's question, "yeah
I blew away a lot of them
" It is a campaign of "total annihilation" say the Russians. But it is being conducted from the relative safety of the air. And there are still believed to be between 8,000 to 40,000 armed, determined Muslim troops in Grozny, waiting for the ground war. What these fighters don't know about revenge and blood feuds is not worth knowing. Somehow, they've missed the spirit of Festivus in that part of the world.. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A CHRISTMAS STORY
HOW TO MAKE YOUR OWN INTERNET FORTUNE Yesterday I promised you a way to become an Internet millionaire. I was not kidding. In fact, I'll give you two ways
either one of which could make you rich. I would like to do them myself
and had hoped to do so. But time is short. Most likely, I will never find the time to embark on either venture. And who knows how much time is left in this mania? So, in keeping with the new cooperative age
I offer a couple of ideas. One today
and one tomorrow. All I ask is that you give me 10% of whatever you make from them. And if this offer contravenes any rules, regulations, laws or protocols of any state, local government, nation or other political entity anywhere in the Milky Way
consider it null and void. Otherwise, I will want my piece of the action. Many readers have commented on my Internet remarks. They've pointed out that I am wrong about this
or wrong about that. I would like to take this opportunity to admit that I am probably wrong about everything regarding the Internet. Every photon, electron and quark. But I don't think it's something you can ever be right about. It is too broad and subtle an issue. As with the doctrine of infant damnation or an employment interview question
you can only tell people what they want to hear. People want to believe that they can get rich because of the Internet
this is my contribution to that end. At least you, dear reader, are getting your opinions from a qualified source. I have never made any money on the Internet
neither in business nor in investments. And not making money sharpens your critical faculties, just as not eating sharpens your appetite. The last thing you want to do is to pay attention to someone who's made millions buying Internet stocks and believes he is an investment genius. I have awoken as a fool often enough already
he still has it to look forward to. The first idea is very simple. It recognizes that the Internet really works
as a tool for doing business. The idea is really nothing more than selling the accoutrements of Christmas, online. A brief search showed a couple of outfits beginning to do this
but none doing it well. The idea is to make it easy and fun to prepare for Christmas. The trouble with Christmas
as least when you have a large family
is that you are so busy you have no time to enjoy it. That has been my experience. We are always on the verge of a complete breakdown
simply because of the logistics. So much preparation
so many places to go
so much shopping. Too much to do
and too little time to do it. The idea is to create a kind of quaint, country store
devoted exclusively to Chrismas
on the Internet. Customers come to the site
they get ideas
stories
poems
recipes
music
all for free. But they also get the opportunity to buy everything they need -- decorations, wrapping paper and even a Christmas tree. The trees themselves could be a big source of profit. It's a huge market. And the price of a tree in the field is very low. The price on the lot in Florida, by contrast, is rather high
because so many middlemen have to be paid. This is where the Internet really should work. It should make it easy and enjoyable for a customer in South Beach to cut his own tree, via Internet, in Maine or Nova Scotia. In just a few minutes time, he could get just about anything he needs
including some holiday ideas and inspiration
and have it delivered to his door. The key, of course, is to make the experience satisfying to customers
and to let prospective customers know about it. But even a few thousand customers might produce a very healthy business. This kind of business is ideal for the Internet in another way. It is the sort of thing that is appropriate for a post-capitalist world. An individual can do it
without a lot of investment. Simplicity and honesty should pay off. The whole idea is to recreate the low-pressure, old- fashioned and personal ambiance that customers want. The entire investment might be something on the order of $50,000. It would be seasonal work too
allowing for long vacations in the summer. But imagine that you could build up a customer base of just 10,000 people. And imagine that
selling wrapping paper, trees, fruitcakes and the like
you could realize a profit on each customer of $25. That is a gross profit of $250,000. After expenses, it might be a profit of $100,000
which should have a capital value of $1 million. These are modest numbers, I believe. But you won't know until you get into the business. You might sell 100 times more than I have imagined. And there would be little need to stock things. In most cases, you would just be a distributor for items stocked elsewhere (but that, too, would have to be figured out.) The key thing to remember is that this could be a real business. There is no need to hype up an IPO and raise millions of dollars from unsuspecting, greedy investors. Instead, you're just trying to harness the power of the Internet as a communication medium to do something that would otherwise be rather marginal. There are, for example, already Christmas shops. There is one in New York and one in Florida. But they have to pay rent all year round. They have rather high fixed expenses, even though their sales are concentrated around the holiday season. Plus, they reach relatively few people. The Internet makes a Christmas shop a better commercial bet. One of the success stories of the Internet is the story of W.W. Grainger. (Someone sent me an article on Grainger
but I couldn't figure out the source.) Grainger did not try to become an Internet company. It merely used the Internet to do what it already did -- sell tools. It is the sort of business that should have been run out of business by the Internet. Because it is a middleman. Customers should have been able to go directly to the manufacturers to buy their tools. But by bringing tools together from many different manufacturers
and by simplifying the shopping process
the 72-year-old business provides a valuable service. Indeed, it is even more valuable with the convenience of the Internet as a communication tool. Grainger already sells $140 million worth of tools via Internet. It believes it will soon do most of its sales that way. The Internet makes it easy to keep track of stock
to speed orders
to make comparisons. Customers like it. None of the jargon of the Internet Era applies. Faces, hits, stickiness
Grainger just keeps doing what it has always done
using the Internet as its own tool. That is also the method behind the Chrismas.com concept (I think, however, that that domain name is already taken). You just create a reliable, convenient
and Christmasy
way for people to prepare for the annual holiday, using the Internet as a tool, not an end. Good luck. I'll tell you where to send my checks. And merry Christmas
Bill Bonner P.S
I'll give you my other idea tomorrow. It's a little more complicated. But the profit potential may be much greater. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A CARTESIAN MEDITATION [ON THE STOCK MARKET] Bill, I have read your newsletter with interest and amusement. I share you bearish sentiments. I have always distrusted the masses, so if everyone says the weather is nice, I feel compelled to say that it isn't. Consequently, I needed to determine if it wasn't just some misanthropic perversity that compelled me to be bearish. Since I am an academician by trade, I sat down, like a good Cartesian, to list what I knew to be clearly and distinctly true. Well, this didn't work, since there is nothing about the stock market that I could claim to know with absolute certainty. Thus, I was compelled to turn to Hume and the estimation of probabilities in a probabilistic universe. I sat down and listed the evidence that would indicate that we are, with a high degree of probability, in the beginning of a major bear market. Below is what I came up with: 1. Dow Theory, which has a 90% track record, flashed a bear market signal a few weeks ago. 2. The collapse in the advance-decline ratio, and the fact that, every time in the last 70 years the Dow's advance-decline ratio has failed to hit a new high when the Dow did, there was a bear market. 3. According to Elliott Wave theory, the Dow has completed a fifth wave of a fifth wave. This signifies a significant trend change. The decline from the high in the Dow was a five-wave decline, which also usually indicates a trend change. Thus, from this perspective, the Dow is in the second-stage rally in a bear market, which is the strongest bear-market rally and is a preparation for the third-stage washout. The NASDQ is in the process of completing its fifth wave. When it does, there will be a significant first-wave decline in this market. 4. Stochastics has failed to confirm any of the tops in 1999. Each new top was met with lower stochastics. The head and shoulders technical formation is still intact. This projects a decline to 1,100 or lower in the Dow. 5. The money supply has declined. Real M3 hit a peak last February. Peaks in money supply have been followed by significant declines in the stock market in 1929, 1946, 1968, 1973 and 1987. There is an approximate six-month period between the peak of M3 and when the market begins to decline. The August highs in the market fit into this time frame. 6. Credit is tightening. At its peak in the first quarter of 1999, new credit was being churned out at the yearly pace of $1.2 trillion. Now it's down 24%, to $942 billion per year. That's the worst quarterly decline in new credit in six years. 7. The extremely high valuations in the stock market from a historical perspective are reasons to be bearish. According to the Fed, the market is over 50% overvalued. 8. The fact that the Fed perceives the market to be extremely overvalued, and Greenspan has warned repeatedly about "irrational exuberance" and the need to act before the market becomes so intertwined with the rest of the economy that, when it does fall, it brings the rest of the economy with it. If the tail begins to wag the dog, then we are all in serious trouble. 9. Gann found that there were many market peaks the ninth year of a decade in an increasing stock market. In this century, this occurred in 1929, 1939 and 1969 in the United States and in 1989 in Japan. These declines are especially significant when combined with the 70-, 60- and 30-year cycles, which saw declines in 1929, 1939 and 1969. [what happened to #10?
very un-Cartesian
] 11. Accounting manipulations are running rampant as businesses attempt to maintain the appearance of continued growth in order to draw in additional investments. Besides all the manipulations that the Internet stocks use to justify their valuations, more classical ones are also in play. Mergers often are used to provide the appearance of greater earnings so as to overstate them, and there has certainly been a plethora of mergers lately. 12. Finally, one of my colleagues at the university is a classical scholar who has lived in an ivory tower for over 30 years and who has traditionally raved against the corruption of classical virtue by modern materialism. When at a faculty meeting he started raving instead about his stock market returns and began to give stock tips to others, I knew that the party was soon to be over. This was confirmed when my secretary, who has no background or experience in investing, also started issuing stock tips to the faculty in the department. Michael Green
|